Petrified Trees found at Yellowstone National Park have been claimed to be successive forests growing over tens of thousands of years. This time-span would go against the Biblical timescale, but could these trees be evidence of Noah’s Flood? Check out these key details: “The stumps are usually barkless and limbless and most of the roots are broken off abruptly. The trees appear to have been broken off from their roots, transported, and deposited (often upright) in...
Read MoreWhich Came First…?
If certain plants need certain insects to pollinate them or else they die…did they just happen to have evolved miraculously at the same time? Evolutionists have also had a confusing understanding of the supposed evolutionary history (of which organisms came first – see http://www.icr.org/article/flower-fossils-100000000-years-out/). See these amazing examples of symbiotic relationships. “Some species, you will have to agree, have very unique harmonious relationships...
Read MoreComparing Evolution and Creation
Take a look, which one do you think makes more sense? “If evolution is true, we should expect that: There would be fossil evidence indicating the ancestor of all the dinosaurs. There would be fossil evidence of intermediate forms showing many stages in the formation of such diverse characteristics as the plates and spikes of the armoured dinosaurs (stegosaurs), the one-to-seven horns of the horned dinosaurs (ceratopian), the distinctive beaks of the duckbilled...
Read MoreWas Antarctica really much warmer in the past?
Rather than climate being drastically warmer millions of years ago (think about the dramatic climate change!) – likely things were very different before a recent flood and there was likely vegetation floating or transported to the area only thousands of years ago. “The second explanation is supported by the thick growth rings in many fossil trees found in high latitudes; had the trees grown where found, the axial tilt of the planet would have prevented sufficient...
Read MoreBlinded!
“Darwinian evolutionists believe RNA, a nucleic acid present in all living cells, were some of the first molecules to form on the Earth and give rise to living things. But for that to happen, the RNA would have had to somehow reproduce on its own without requisite enzymes that would not have evolved yet. Szostak claimed to have facilitated RNA self-replication in his lab, but earlier this month, he said one of his colleagues, Tivoli Olsen, realized they had...
Read MoreAssumed, Not Supported
Evolution is often simply assumed rather than supported by evidence! I think this is so often the case. In reviewing an evolutionary book, one research notes that the book “is not about how eyes evolved, but rather how the author imagines that eyes had evolved. In fact, throughout this work, the author takes evolution as a given (i.e. eyes exist, therefore they evolved) and does not attempt to test it in any way. Schwab freely interprets anatomical features, often in...
Read MoreWhere Do Dirty Snowballs Come From?
Comets are dirty snowballs that…as we would expect…burn up as they go around the sun! So if billions of years are true as many suggest, then why do we still have comets? When I (Brian) was in a college Astronomy 101 course at a large secular University, my teacher did answer that. She said that there is a Kuiper Belt or an Oort Cloud around the solar system that occasionally throws in a new comet. I thought to myself “Oh, okay. That makes sense.” But a few years...
Read MoreInformation – Evidence of Random Evolution or Created Design?
“According to Carl Sagan, one of our best-known scientists, ‘The information content of a simple cell has been established as around one trillion bits, comparable to about 100 million pages of the Encyclopaedia Britannica’ [emphasis mine].1 What Sagan is talking about here is the information contained within the genetic code (DNA) of a microscopic Escherichia coli bacterium that lives in our intestines.” Read more here:...
Read MoreAnswer – Not Accepted!
Scientific conclusions are based on some element of faith. Now we have to define “faith.” Some define faith as believing in something with no evidence for it. This is absolutely not the definition of faith, though it would be the definition of blind faith. Faith, even in religion or God, is very often associated with evidence. In the quote here, this scientist shows his bias and shows his faith – and blind faith, in this case. He is not being open-minded to...
Read MoreWhen 3 Equals 5?
This is one of my (Brian Mariani’s) favorite quotes showing the challenge of taking the observations from science and correctly interpreting them.
Read MoreWhat Do You See?
The way we view the world affects what we see (when wearing red glasses – the world appears more red, and therefore viewing the world in terms of evolution – that’s all you would expect to see). This is one of the main challenges in the Creation/Evolution debate. Both sides believe that they have evidence, but let’s continually try to study it deeper to look at which view makes the most...
Read More“Scientific evidence does not have to be interpreted. Science is science.”
The above was a response (“Scientific evidence does not have to be interpreted. Science is science.”) that I received while in a debate with an evolutionist. This is how I rejoined in the debate: Crime Scene Scientists, Paleontologists, and Archaeologists along with probably every other scientist is faced with the challenges of how to best interpret the evidence. If you were a crime scene investigator, you would come into a house and observe a dead body laying on the...
Read More
