Here is a great example of real scientific investigations where the scientists’ assumptions changed the date numerous times. Note: This could be an example of how scientists can refine and get better results over time, but it is nonetheless definitely a great example showing some reasons to doubt the accuracy of radiometric dating or reasons to hold more lightly to quoted radiometric results. Read the details...
Read MoreI tried to limit the size of this post (HA!) – but there were some great excerpts from the following article. Enjoy! “The theory that explained how Saturn’s rings could persist through 4.6 billion years of solar system evolution also explained why Saturn was the only planet that could have a ring. Then those theories had to be revised to account for the rings of Uranus. The revisions implied that Jupiter would not have a ring. Now Jupiter has been found to have a...
Read MoreEvidence to make you question the reliability of radiometric dating: “The following is a quote from The Earth: An Introduction to Physical Geology by Tarbuck & Lutgens, pp. 55-57, (1987). “For example, at the stage when about 50 percent of the magma has solidified, the melt will be greatly depleted in iron, magnesium, and calcium, because these elements are found in the earliest formed minerals. But at the same time, it will be enriched in the elements...
Read More“All the footprints are indeed going in the same direction, as if all the dinosaurs are fleeing, but what were they fleeing from? We suggest it was not from predators, but from a flood of water. What flood? Noah’s Flood, described in the Bible in Genesis Chapters 6–9. Another reason is that footprints normally don’t last long. Try this yourself: leave footprints outside anywhere you like, and see how long they last. Noah’s worldwide flood provided the sediment...
Read MoreHere is more evidence showing a lack of evidence for the Kuiper Belt. This means that there is still not enough evidence for the natural origins of short-period comets and this points to a recent Creation and Creator!! Read more here: https://creation.com/charon-crater-comet-conundrum
Read More– That again shows the intelligence of ancient man!! And I love how they try to date it using radiometric dating, but come up with dates that are “not reliable.” Radiometric dating requires some big assumptions…and there are big differences from the evolutionary assumptions to the Biblical Creationist’s assumptions! Check out these quotes: “as far as archaeologists peer back into history, humans have always been humans, displaying their God-given abilities of...
Read MoreOn Tuesday, we showed some examples of how cave formations can and have formed quickly! In this picture, you can see our stalactites in our “cave” storage area underneath the concrete entranceway. If one inch forms every 100 years, our 40 year old office building is more than 300 years old!!! (But actually most of that larger soda straw has formed in less than 3 years!!)
Read MoreVisitors on cave tours are almost always told that the large stalactites and stalagmites have taken tens of thousands or even millions of years to form. Recent discoveries have shown this is not necessarily so. Consider the following: A bat (not yet decomposed) was found cemented inside a stalagmite in Carlsbad Caverns, New Mexico. This had to have formed recently and VERY rapidly. In a cave in the Tehuacan Valley of Mexico, there is a vast chamber called Hall of the...
Read MoreIt is estimated, in the assumed billions of years models, that “only one-sixth of time is recorded” by sediments (Barrell, 1917, p. 797). Are they sure all that time even existed?? Check here for some of the problems with the Billions of Years Geologic Models: https://creation.com/changing-paradigms-in-stratigraphy-2
Read MoreCould Io, one of Jupiter’s four brightest moons, be billions of years old?? “Io is the most volcanically active body in the solar system. One scientist, writing in the journal Science, calculated that if Io had been erupting over the assumed billions of years, at only 10% of its current rate, it would have erupted its entire mass 40 times over by now.” Read more here:...
Read MoreDid planets form really quickly – within about 5 million years?? Is that really true?? This new research talks about how the Earth would have had to form much more quickly than they have previously thought – due to the study of iron compositions of the Earth and meteorites. These scientists make new estimations for how the Earth formed, but it appears that a lot of detail is still missing. So often this is the case: a scientist says that they have figured out how...
Read MoreSince Darwin first proposed his controversial theory more than 160 years ago, the accepted age of the earth and universe (by evolutionist) has steadily risen. As each new biased dating method has come along with an older date, the new date has been rapidly accepted and the previous methods simply discarded. By hiding the “origins question” behind billions of years, the unsolvable problems of evolution are made to look more feasible in their eyes. Our media and...
Read More
Did Humans Evolve to Drink Milk? sciencemag.org/news/2021/01/h… Yeah, that article was interesting. I think there are a lot of factors weighing in here. And I also found this article: creation.com/lactose-intole… Read more about this here: discovercreation.org/blog/202…
Join our mailing list to receive the latest news and updates from our team.
Would you like to subscribe to our mailing list? Join our mailing list to receive the latest news and updates from our team, and be the first to know about new products and special offers in our store!
