“The father of modern linguistics, Noam Chomsky—a self-professed atheist/agnostic—said that the process by which the human mind achieved its present state of complexity is “a total mystery”. He further wrote: It is perfectly safe to attribute this development to ‘natural selection’, so long as we realize that there is no substance to this assertion, that it amounts to nothing more than a belief that there is some naturalistic explanation for these phenomena.” Read more...Read More
Huge Problems! – Shouldn’t they panic?
The James Webb Telescope Discovers Huge Problems for secular models, but most still aren’t panicking!! “It might seem strange that secular astronomers aren’t reacting more strongly than this. The JW observations are so inconsistent with secular expectations that it seems logical to question the broader model that produced those expectations. But this would be to ignore the bigger context. With very few exceptions, the secular astronomical community accepts the Big Bang...Read More
Is Science Only About Natural Explanations??
“Science does deal with non-observable, intelligent causes where it suits the practitioners—for example, forensic science is all about finding evidence that ‘person X poisoned person Y with strychnine’, for example (natural causes cannot account for person Y’s body containing strychnine, so someone, an intelligent agent, was responsible). Likewise, the SETI program is tacit agreement that science can tell the difference between natural causes and intelligent causes...Read More
Bias and Censorship within Science!!
These are fascinating sections that incorporates numerous secular scientists’ own words on the problems with communicating the problems with modern evolutionary theories. I have copied a large section here, because I want you to read it! I thought it was so telling to hear it from the secular experts: “The concealment of funding Lynn Margulis saw that government funding for evolutionary research comes in a disjointed manner from various distinctly separate...Read More
Praise the Lord for Dr. Menton!
Dr. David Menton had a tremendous impact on sharing God’s Word and God’s Truth to this work that needs True Hope. Praise God for the legacy he left behind! “Dr. Menton was well known around the US and at the Creation Museum for his stimulating talks, such as “The Hearing Ear and the Seeing Eye” (on the remarkable complexity of the human body), “Three Ways to Make an Apeman” (comparing the anatomy of apelike creatures in the fossil record to humans),...Read More
Thermodynamics “Not” a Problem for Evolutionists?
Is the Second Law of Thermodynamics “Not” a Problem for Evolutionists? “’Professor Dave’ argues that the origin of life does not face thermodynamic hurdles. He states that natural systems often spontaneously increase in order, such as water freezing or soap molecules forming micelles (e.g., spheres or bilayers). He is making the very common mistake that he fails to recognize that the formation of a cell represents both a dramatic decrease in entropy and an equally...Read More
The Good and the Bad of Peer Review:
“Peer review, while advertised as ensuring the veracity of published material, does not actually do this. Numerous frauds have been documented. Rather, it serves to enforce the orthodoxy of the ruling paradigm. This is well illustrated by the experience of Dr Mary Schweitzer, who first discovered soft tissue in dinosaur bones: ”I had one reviewer tell me that he didn’t care what the data said, he knew that what I was finding wasn’t possible,” says Schweitzer. ”I...Read More
Alternatives in science are often squelched!
But alternative ideas and views should be encouraged and developed – as they often drive innovation and the progress of science! “Data do not speak for themselves but need to be interpreted within a framework or paradigm – a set of assumptions about the nature of reality. Disciplines tend to get captured by a ‘ruling’ paradigm that forms the unquestioned framework for interpreting data. Inconsistent data are typically disregarded using various...Read More
LIMITS OF SCIENCE
“Science does not prove hypotheses/theories to be true, only that they are false. The best it can do is provide evidence that is consistent with a theory but this does not prove the theory to be true. The same evidence could be consistent with some other theory. Evidence that is consistent with two (or more) theories does not provide a basis for choosing between these theories. However, evidence that is inconsistent with a theory demonstrates that it is wrong....Read More
“If ENCODE is right, evolution is wrong.”
If Evolution has occurred due to mutations occurring randomly over long periods of time, then the human genome would just be filled with extra stuff – “Junk DNA”. The Encode Project “undermined the “junk DNA” myth and simultaneously fulfilled an ID prediction: that non-coding parts of the genome would prove functional. Junk-DNA proponents like Dan Graur were upset at the time, admitting as Jonathan Wells reported, “If ENCODE is right, evolution is wrong.”...Read More
History within Science??
“There is no way in the present to test or repeat what happened in the past. Any conclusions about things that are not testable in the present must be based on unprovable assumptions about the untestable past. The late Ernst Mayr, who was considered by many to be one of the 20th century’s most influential evolutionists, put it this way: Evolutionary biology, in contrast with physics and chemistry, is an historical science—the evolutionist attempts to explain events...Read More
Christianity Makes Scientific Progress Possible!
“Results should be reported honestly, because God has forbidden false witness (Exodus 20:16). But if evolution were true, then why not lie? It is not that surprising that scientific fraud is an increasing problem.7 Note, it’s important to understand the point here—not that atheists can’t be moral but that they have no objective basis for this morality from within their own system. The fanatical atheistic evolutionist Dawkins admits that our “best impulses have...Read More