Bioluminescense, one example being the lighting up of a firefly, is thought to have evolved 40-50 times in independent creatures based on studies. How does that ability supposedly evolve?? “Evolutionists assume that it is ‘easy’ to evolve the capacity for bioluminescence, based on their assumption that the phenomenon has evolved in parallel so frequently. “The ingredients are usually not hard to come by. Stand in the dark, mix some egg white with oxygen and luciferin...
Read MoreExtra DNA Letters – New Evolution??
“Here is the main author of the paper ignoring the giant chicken-and-egg problem staring him in the face. Not only do you need nucleotides to come about through naturalistic means, and not only do you need them to spontaneously polymerize, but the DNA molecule is useless without a predetermined set of instructions coded upon it. As Dr John Sanford says in Evolution’s Achilles’ Heels: “Life isn’t based upon biochemicals. You can have all the biochemicals you want....
Read MoreWrongly Defined as Evolution!
Ceratopsian (horned) dinosaurs appear to develop their horns as a sign of maturity. Some young specimens may have been wrongly classified as evolutionary links. Check this out: “Liaosaurus has features that spoil the idea of a smooth evolutionary progression. Rather, some structural similarities between different ceratopsians are now regarded as homoplasies, i.e. independently arisen and not the result of evolution from a common ancestor. This is consistent with...
Read More“Where are all the bodies???”
Can you imagine stumbling across 4 billion skeletons? – “Where are all the bodies???” “Evolutionists also claim there was a ‘Stone Age’ of about 100,000 years11 when between one million and 10 million people lived on Earth. Fossil evidence shows that people buried their dead, often with artefacts—cremation was not practised until relatively recent times (in evolutionary thinking). If there were just one million people alive during that time, with an average...
Read MoreFunny Addition to Some Significant Evidence!
Did you hear about the scientific paper (explained here: https://phys.org/news/2018-05-gene-survey-reveals-facets-evolution.html) that showed “that 90 percent of animal life, genetically speaking, is roughly the same age”? How do we correctly interpret that scientific evidence? Notice that that is continually the question that we have to ask – and that shows that everyone is forced to say that their assumptions affect how the data is interpreted. Note the following...
Read MoreDid we observe evolution…??
Did we observe Evolution when killfish were able to start living in polluted waters? “there is nothing ‘evolutionary’ in what the researchers observed and documented, in the sense of any evidence of mutation-derived increase in genetic information as microbe-to-man evolution requires. The killifish mutations were already present in the clean-water populations, ready for natural selection to act upon when the environment turned toxic. (Natural selection can only act...
Read MoreStasis & Sudden Appearance – Evidence of Evolution? – No.
“The history of most fossil species include two features particularly inconsistent with gradualism: 1) Stasis – most species exhibit no directional change during their tenure on earth. They appear in the fossil record looking much the same as when they disappear; morphological change is usually limited and directionless; 2) Sudden appearance – in any local area, a species does not arise gradually by the steady transformation of its ancestors; it appears...
Read MoreAwe, Wonder, Worship!
Often I read evolutionary statements like the following. Notice that evolutionists often speak with almost religious language and this makes me think that they worship and serve the creation rather than the Creator (Remember – Rom 1:25). “Charles Darwin, of course, belonged to the second group, and expressed the beauty of evolution in the famous final paragraph of the book that started it all—On the Origin of Species (1859): There is grandeur in this view of life,...
Read More“I Live By Science…Not Faith!!”
How would you respond to the following statement? “Christians only believe based on faith. Evolutionists use evidence and reasoning.” In conversation, as we were talking about this, one good argument that we might use is that there are many people that believe in Evolution basically only on faith – having not based their belief on evidence and reasoning. So ultimately, there are some Christians that have not studied and take their position by faith, but the same is...
Read More8 HUGE Obstacles to Evolution from Chemistry!
8 Obstacles (due to the Laws of Chemistry) of Getting Life from Chemicals: The Problem of Unreactivity The Problem of Ionization The Problem of Mass Action The Problem of Reactivity The Problem of Selectivity The Problem of Solubility The Problem of Sugar The Problem of Chirality ...
Read MoreChemistry Won’t Even Allow Evolution!!
This is an awesome article that simply breaks down the idea of Evolution before it can happen!! From https://www.icr.org/article/evolution-hopes-you-dont-know-chemistry-problem-co/, see the following quotes: “Chemists are trained to understand the mechanisms of how molecules react and how to activate molecules so they will react predictably and in a controlled fashion. If a chemist wanted to synthesize the polymer chain of proteins or DNA in the...
Read MoreAn Evolutionary Anthropologist Changes His Mind!
“A committed teacher of evolutionary anthropology at a major secular university (Wisconsin State) until 1975, Dr Neil Huber, of Washington State, USA, is now a whole-hearted creationist. A committed Christian by 1981, by 1990 he had come to accept the literal Genesis viewpoint. “I grew up in total ignorance of the Bible”, he says. “I knew about Christ from school plays, Christmas, and things of that kind, but my family was very much opposed to Christianity. As my...
Read More