Bats have the extraordinary ability to close their ears as they send sonar signals and reopen them in time to hear returning echos. They do this at the incredible rate of 50 to 60 times per second. Studying the bat’s unique method of detecting objects has allowed scientists to discover the principles of sonar. Using these principles, mankind has produced sensitive detection instruments of his own. As complex and sensitive as our sonar detection systems are, they...
Read MoreHide the Complexity!
“Australia’s taxpayer-funded national broadcaster, the ABC, interviewed Australian academics who tried to counter such damaging thoughts that there could be something wrong with evolution.3However, in stoically ‘holding the fort’, some gave away the game. They admitted the horrendous complexity of how DNA works, which is part of the problem for the neat evolutionary story-telling that students are exposed to at school and university. Some even suggested that the...
Read MoreBioluminescense – Evolved 40-50 times??
Bioluminescense, one example being the lighting up of a firefly, is thought to have evolved 40-50 times in independent creatures based on studies. How does that ability supposedly evolve?? “Evolutionists assume that it is ‘easy’ to evolve the capacity for bioluminescence, based on their assumption that the phenomenon has evolved in parallel so frequently. “The ingredients are usually not hard to come by. Stand in the dark, mix some egg white with oxygen and luciferin...
Read MoreExtra DNA Letters – New Evolution??
“Here is the main author of the paper ignoring the giant chicken-and-egg problem staring him in the face. Not only do you need nucleotides to come about through naturalistic means, and not only do you need them to spontaneously polymerize, but the DNA molecule is useless without a predetermined set of instructions coded upon it. As Dr John Sanford says in Evolution’s Achilles’ Heels: “Life isn’t based upon biochemicals. You can have all the biochemicals you want....
Read MoreHow is there a creator God with all the extinctions?
Claim: If all the animals were created, then why have 99% of the created creatures gone extinct in the fossil record. This goes against the idea of a creator – wouldn’t a creator God have wanted to preserve his creations? Recently, I heard these critiques about the Young Earth Creation model. And I think it again points to a misunderstanding of the Young Earth Creation perspective. God created all of the animals. God’s created animals have had the ability (genetics)...
Read MoreCoral – Evidence of Age or Quick Growth?
In a popular evolutionary book, the argument was made that coral growth within fossil corals can accurately show us that the length of days were shorter hundreds of millions of years ago. But from this further examination, there are a lot of other factors that also influence the growth of corals. And that there is still good evidence for the creation model! See more here:...
Read MoreCelebrating Darwin to Acknowledging a Designer!
“German paleontologist Günter Bechly, former curator of the Stuttgart State Museum of Natural History, is a world expert on fossilized dragonflies. He has discovered more than 170 new species, and 11 new genera have been named after him. To prepare for an exhibit celebrating Charles Darwin’s 200th birthday, Bechly read intelligent design books—and became an ID proponent.” In response to the time required to make evolution possible, Bechly says: “A mathematician is...
Read MoreHemaglobin – No Traceable Evolutionary History!!
Hemaglobin – No Traceable Evolutionary History!! (in other words: Evidence Against Evolution) “Consider hemoglobin, for example, the protein that carries oxygen in red blood cells. Dickerson says that hemoglobins pose “a puzzling problem. Hemoglobins occur sporadically among the invertebrate phyla [the animals without backbones] in no obvious pattern.” That is, they don’t occur in an evolutionary branching pattern. I would suggest that they do occur in a...
Read MoreUnderstanding Complex Eyes – Evidence for Evolution or Creation?
“Comparing the mirrors with the lens cylinder system, Land says, “Both are successful and very sophisticated image-forming devices, but I cannot imagine an intermediate form [or common ancestral type] that would work at all.” The kind of design in these eyes, he says, seems impossible to explain as a result of evolutionary relationship. So Land goes on to suggest that the shrimp-like animals with different systems should not be classified as evolutionary relatives,...
Read MoreSimilar Features are Evidence of Evolution, Right?? –WRONG!!
“Thus the front appendages of reptiles, mammals, birds, and humans are said to be homologous. Therefore, they must be controlled by homologous genes. The fact is, however, that it has been proved in many cases that homologous structures are not produced by homologous genes!” Read more about this here: https://creation.com/a-serious-problem-for-homology
Read MoreSimilar Embryos – Evidence of Evolution??
Similarities within embryos of different creatures are evidence of evolution – or are they? Embryos don’t always look similar or follow paths of prior evolution, in fact: “The embryonic development of so-called homologous structures is often different—and not just with respect to limbs. As far back as 1894, the American embryologist Edmund Wilson wrote, “It is a familiar fact that parts which … are undoubtedly homologous, often differ widely … in [their] mode of...
Read More“NEED WATER?”
“Camels have red blood cells that are shaped flat, oval, and much smaller than human red blood cells. Human red blood cells are round. When humans become dehydrated, our blood becomes “sluggish” as the blood cells get stuck; a 5% water loss can result in serious medical problems. For humans, a 12 % water loss can result in death by dehydration; but not so for a camel, with its smaller, flatter, oval-shaped red blood cells. Even as the camel’s water level drops,...
Read More