“We still don’t have a mechanism to account for the big structural changes that must have taken place: evolving from asexual to sexual, from single-cell to multi-cell, and the big one—going from non-life to a single cell that has DNA, has proteins capable of reading the DNA and using it to make new proteins including an exact copy of itself!” Read more about this here:...
Read MoreNoah Took “Supermutts” on the Ark!

It is estimated that there were less than 15,000 species or different kinds on the ark and that only had to include “mammals, birds, reptiles, and possibly land-reproducing amphibians.” It is estimated that of those types of animals, there are only 30,000 living species today. So those animal types only needed to double in species. This is very possible to do in only a few thousand years, especially with artificial breeding programs. For example, “most dog breeds...
Read MoreHide the Complexity!
“Australia’s taxpayer-funded national broadcaster, the ABC, interviewed Australian academics who tried to counter such damaging thoughts that there could be something wrong with evolution.3However, in stoically ‘holding the fort’, some gave away the game. They admitted the horrendous complexity of how DNA works, which is part of the problem for the neat evolutionary story-telling that students are exposed to at school and university. Some even suggested that the...
Read MoreBioluminescense – Evolved 40-50 times??
Bioluminescense, one example being the lighting up of a firefly, is thought to have evolved 40-50 times in independent creatures based on studies. How does that ability supposedly evolve?? “Evolutionists assume that it is ‘easy’ to evolve the capacity for bioluminescence, based on their assumption that the phenomenon has evolved in parallel so frequently. “The ingredients are usually not hard to come by. Stand in the dark, mix some egg white with oxygen and luciferin...
Read MoreExtra DNA Letters – New Evolution??
“Here is the main author of the paper ignoring the giant chicken-and-egg problem staring him in the face. Not only do you need nucleotides to come about through naturalistic means, and not only do you need them to spontaneously polymerize, but the DNA molecule is useless without a predetermined set of instructions coded upon it. As Dr John Sanford says in Evolution’s Achilles’ Heels: “Life isn’t based upon biochemicals. You can have all the biochemicals you want....
Read MoreHow is there a creator God with all the extinctions?
Claim: If all the animals were created, then why have 99% of the created creatures gone extinct in the fossil record. This goes against the idea of a creator – wouldn’t a creator God have wanted to preserve his creations? Recently, I heard these critiques about the Young Earth Creation model. And I think it again points to a misunderstanding of the Young Earth Creation perspective. God created all of the animals. God’s created animals have had the ability (genetics)...
Read MoreHemaglobin – No Traceable Evolutionary History!!
Hemaglobin – No Traceable Evolutionary History!! (in other words: Evidence Against Evolution) “Consider hemoglobin, for example, the protein that carries oxygen in red blood cells. Dickerson says that hemoglobins pose “a puzzling problem. Hemoglobins occur sporadically among the invertebrate phyla [the animals without backbones] in no obvious pattern.” That is, they don’t occur in an evolutionary branching pattern. I would suggest that they do occur in a...
Read MoreSimilar Features are Evidence of Evolution, Right?? –WRONG!!
“Thus the front appendages of reptiles, mammals, birds, and humans are said to be homologous. Therefore, they must be controlled by homologous genes. The fact is, however, that it has been proved in many cases that homologous structures are not produced by homologous genes!” Picture source and read more about this here: https://creation.com/a-serious-problem-for-homology
Read MoreFunny Addition to Some Significant Evidence!
Did you hear about the scientific paper (explained here: https://phys.org/news/2018-05-gene-survey-reveals-facets-evolution.html) that showed “that 90 percent of animal life, genetically speaking, is roughly the same age”? How do we correctly interpret that scientific evidence? Notice that that is continually the question that we have to ask – and that shows that everyone is forced to say that their assumptions affect how the data is interpreted. Note the following...
Read MoreJust Evolved Animals??

Are humans different than animals or are we just evolved animals? When I ask people, I have found that a large majority realize that there is more to us as humans than simply an evolved type of ape-like creature. It is clear that we are different based on our conscience, morality, ability to critically think and communicate. It may be slightly possible that those are all evolved traits, but given scientific evidence, we want to come to the reasonable conclusions....
Read MoreDid we observe evolution…??
Did we observe Evolution when killfish were able to start living in polluted waters? “there is nothing ‘evolutionary’ in what the researchers observed and documented, in the sense of any evidence of mutation-derived increase in genetic information as microbe-to-man evolution requires. The killifish mutations were already present in the clean-water populations, ready for natural selection to act upon when the environment turned toxic. (Natural selection can only act...
Read MoreThe Unending Myth: Humans and Chimps are 99% similar.

Why does this myth live on? “Comparison of whole genomes has revealed much greater differences than 1%, and yet the myth of 1% persists. Why? Why does Science perpetuate the myth in 2012? In 2007 Cohen cited geneticist Svante Pääbo, a chimp consortium member at the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Germany, as saying, “In the end, it’s a political and social and cultural thing about how we see our differences.”2 Perhaps evolutionists will not let go...
Read More