“Scientific facts are obtained by making observations about today’s creation, not yesterday’s. We do not have yesterday. The origins debate is not the Bible vs science; it is biblical history vs extra-biblical history. Leading evolutionary scientists are not wrong about science; they are wrong about history. Dr Collins, BioLogos and other evolutionists take today’s discoveries and interpret them to fit with evolutionary history—a history that they accept by faith....
Read MoreFlunking Scientists
“In most careers, being wrong too often is grounds for dismissal. False prophets in ancient kingdoms were stoned or shamed out of town. Only in science, it seems, can experts consistently get it wrong, and not only keep their jobs, but be highly esteemed as experts. Among the guiltiest of the lot are planetary scientists, whose predictions have been consistently wrong for almost every planetary body studied since the dawn of the space age. Their orbital mechanics is...
Read More“Earth Has Done Remarkable Things”
Consider this statement by Gregory Laughlin, an astrophysicist and planet hunter at the University of California, Santa Cruz: “From our anthropocentric viewpoint, we naturally separate ourselves from the planet that we live on, but if one adopts the point of view of an external observer, it is the ‘planet’ (taken as a whole) that has done these remarkable things.” Notice how his worldview affects his conclusions. No matter who you are or what...
Read MoreAnother Mystery that Science Hasn’t Solved
There is still a great deal we don’t know about the Universe. Consider this quote regarding neutrinos speeding up radioactive decay: “What we’re suggesting is that something that doesn’t really interact with anything is changing something that can’t be changed.” Quote from Jere Jenkins, Purdue nuclear engineer. Source: Dan Stober, The Strange Case of Solar Flares and Radioactive Elements, August 23, 2010,...
Read MoreDamage of Evolutionary Teaching
A student in Minnesota told us that she “used to go to church,” but now she is a leader in an atheist club at her university. We asked, “what happened?” Her response was that six weeks into her first biology class she was convinced that evolution was true and therefore the Bible was wrong. Sadly, this is not an isolated case. Most of the atheist students that we have come across have come from church-going homes. Most say that evolution is what has changed their...
Read MoreOpposing Views of God and Reality
The Christian says: “Atheists don’t want reality to be that there is a God that they are accountable to.” The Atheist says: “Christians want reality to be that there is a God who loves and cares for them and who bring meaning and purpose to life.” Who’s view is correct? By Brian Mariani
Read MoreAre You a Neanderthal???
Neanderthals are “characterized by prominent eyebrow ridges (like modern Australian aborigines), low forehead, long narrow skull, a protruding upper jaw, and a strong lower jaw with a short chin. They were deep-chested, large-boned individuals with a powerful build. It should be emphasized, however, that none of these features fall outside the range of normal human anatomy.” “If he (Neandertal man) could be reincarnated and placed in a New York subway...
Read MoreFrom Single to Many – Why? How?
“Evolution faces a tough dichotomy to get around if multicellularity is to evolve: cellular selection vs organismal integrity. At the single cell level, selection will favour cells that reproduce better. But if those cells are allowed to reproduce uncontrollably in a multicellular organism, they will inexorably destroy organismal integrity, and harm or kill the organism, also causing the ‘fitter’ cells to die. …” “However, this leads to a mystery for the...
Read MoreScience is Faith-based
“According to this biblical definition, science itself is a faith-based system, for it is a system often governed by “the evidence of things not seen.” Indeed, this is an essential modus operandi in science. Without ever having directly observed them, science believes in many concepts and systems at the subatomic, the super-galactic, and even the macroscopic natural level of life. Black holes, certain astronomical objects, the chemical composition of celestial...
Read MoreAre “Multiverses” a Good Explanation?
“Multiverses supposedly explain the existence of [our universe] with special characteristics. But this is really special pleading, i.e. an explanation these atheists accept for the universe but would not tolerate for a second to explain anything else. Consider if we found a pattern of markings on a beach which spelled your name. Naturally you would conclude that an intelligent agent had written it. This is more plausible than thinking that wind and wave erosion...
Read MoreDoesn’t Every Scientist Accept the Big Bang Theory?
“Those who urge Christians to accept the big bang as a ‘science fact’ point to its near-universal acceptance by the scientific community. However, [33 top secular scientists who oppose the big bang theory] describe a situation familiar to many creationist scientists: ‘An open exchange of ideas is lacking in most mainstream conferences … doubt and dissent are not tolerated, and young scientists learn to remain silent if they have something negative to say about the...
Read MoreWhat’s the Alternative?
“We might think chapter 2 of Genesis teaches that ‘God formed the man of dust from the ground,’ and Eve from Adam—but if they were the product of evolution, then early Genesis becomes a myth, and everyone who assumed the history to be true (including Jesus and Paul) were naive. Original sin becomes a theoretical construct rather than harsh reality, so why do we desperately need Christ?” “What’s the alternative? Theistic evolutionists say we must bend or die, but...
Read More
Friends - Richard's Life was Changed!! - And this is why he is leading AOI's Colorado Family Camp! Join us July 30 - Aug 4 - conta.cc/3X4JroB pic.twitter.com/u8j1AP1Pmu
